<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boogiepop and Others</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azureflame.dasaku.net/2007/04/19/boogiepop-and-others/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azureflame.dasaku.net/2007/04/19/boogiepop-and-others/</link>
	<description>Fat cats make anime better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 06:13:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hige</title>
		<link>http://azureflame.dasaku.net/2007/04/19/boogiepop-and-others/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Hige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azureflame.ikimashou.net/?p=82#comment-49</guid>
		<description>In comparison to Boogiepop Phantom the live action film is incredibly weak in every single way. I&#039;m sure if my regard for the anime wasn&#039;t so high my opinion of the film wouldn&#039;t be so low, but the void of quality between the two made it impossible to get beyond the live action film&#039;s faults.

It&#039;s not a completely appalling movie... just very am-dram and naff. Isolated from its superior sister titles it&#039;d be a kinda fun, cheesy experience. I&#039;d never recommend it over them, though, and it&#039;d be at the very bottom of the list labelled as a mild curiosity.

Heh, that was a bit of a rant! I think I&#039;m just bitter that they completely ruined Nagi =/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In comparison to Boogiepop Phantom the live action film is incredibly weak in every single way. I&#8217;m sure if my regard for the anime wasn&#8217;t so high my opinion of the film wouldn&#8217;t be so low, but the void of quality between the two made it impossible to get beyond the live action film&#8217;s faults.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a completely appalling movie&#8230; just very am-dram and naff. Isolated from its superior sister titles it&#8217;d be a kinda fun, cheesy experience. I&#8217;d never recommend it over them, though, and it&#8217;d be at the very bottom of the list labelled as a mild curiosity.</p>
<p>Heh, that was a bit of a rant! I think I&#8217;m just bitter that they completely ruined Nagi =/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.199 seconds -->
